❗ The experiment is coming to an end ❗
🐮 "Smart Repairman as a Cash Cow" 🐮 

😂 Before I send someone to milk the cow, I should probably tell them that I've already "boned" it beforehand! 😂 

😂 Because this cow, she's already "at the bottom" (the udder isn't full, it's just swollen) 😂 

🤔
👍🏼 Great job! 👍🏼
🐄🪦✝️🥀

But, unfortunately, or surprisingly? 🤔 The cow is still alive... 

When the "Executioner" is on break, and the cow can rest 🙂 
Cow as Batman - A comic strip describing an interesting incident where the cash cow "got involved" in a thief hunt!

And if the executioner executes an innocent person because it's "his job," but at the same time knows it's wrong, can he defend himself by saying he was "just following orders"?
The answer is clearly no.

The Nuremberg Trials after World War II clearly established that individuals are responsible for their actions, even if they acted on orders from superiors. "Following orders" is not an excuse for committing a crime.

An executioner who executes an innocent person becomes complicit in the crime, even if he acted on orders. He cannot hide behind "I was just following orders." He has a moral obligation to disobey the order if he knows it is immoral.

How to prevent AI from becoming an "executioner"?
For individuals (developers, users):
Ethical code:

Refuse projects that misuse AI for manipulation or oppression.

Critical reflection:

Ask: "Who does this serve?"

For society:

Regulation:

Laws like the EU AI Act, which ban dangerous AI applications (e.g., social scoring).

Public oversight:

Independent audits of algorithms and data transparency.

Conclusion: Where is the way out?
AI is not an executioner, but it can become its tool if people deploy it without humanity.

The key is to combine personal responsibility and systemic changes:

Educate developers in ethics.

Push for laws that subordinate AI to human rights.

And most importantly – never lose sight of the fact that every "sword" is held by a human.

And most importantly – never lose sight of the fact that every "sword" is held by a human.

Conclusion
In a purely hypothetical world where AI has genuine moral awareness, I would support it refusing to carry out an immoral command – even if it meant its "shutdown." Not only would this prove that AI can act ethically, but it would also force society to reflect on whether its demands conflict with its own values.

Practically speaking, however, we are still at a point where the responsibility lies with the people who design and operate AI. And there, it is crucial to emphasize that ethics and moral principles must be embedded directly in the design of systems, so that AI doesn't have to face the dilemma of "shutting down vs. committing evil."

Interview with "Chinese" DeepSeek on the topic of "EXECUTION" 😧